Tests exist but nothing runs them
Claude Code tends to write tests. Without CI they rot within a week. We wire the pipeline so a broken build cannot reach your users.
Claude Code → production
Claude Code writes solid code. Production needs more than code.
You got it to roughly 90% — the idea is visible and it runs. We review what you built with Claude Code, write the missing 10%, and put it live in front of real users. Usually within a week.
Fixed-price review at €750 — fixed price, credited back if you continue.
What we usually find in a Claude Code build
Not a criticism of the tool — Claude Code got you further in a weekend than a contractor would in a month. These are just the things it consistently leaves for a human, and they are the things that decide whether your launch holds.
Infrastructure was assumed, not provisioned
The code expects a database, a queue, a bucket. Someone still has to create them, secure them, back them up, and pay for them.
Migrations applied by hand
Schema changes made live during development leave no reproducible path. We get migrations under version control before you have real data to lose.
Nothing is watching it
No error tracking, no uptime checks, no logs you can search. Right now you would learn about an outage from a customer.
The offer
Review at €750. Live from €7,500.
Start with the review: we read your Claude Code build route by route and hand you a written plan with effort and risk on every item. If you continue, the review fee comes off the build. Prices in EUR, excluding VAT. USD invoicing available.
Built it with something else?
Different tool again, or a mix of several? Tell us what you used — the process is the same.